AVADirect Custom Computers Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Community > Technology News
  Active Topics Active Topics
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

Goodbye Traditional Semiconductors?

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Griffin Ralston View Drop Down
AVADirect Staff
AVADirect Staff


Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Posts: 43
  Quote Griffin Ralston Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Goodbye Traditional Semiconductors?
    Posted: 11 Aug 2010 at 6:04pm

Goodbye Traditional Semiconductors?

 
Researchers at The Ohio State University are "ditching primitive silicon circuits," and pioneering the use of organic spintronics devices. Prof. Arthur J. Epstein and his team claim to have created "the worlds first functioning spintronics device... which promises to use "less space, processes data faster, and consumes less power than its silicon brethren."

Essentially a plastic replacement for traditional semiconductor based memory, it harnesses magnetism not electricity to store information, saving a lot of energy in the process. Because traditional memory uses electrical charge to assign the value of digital information, with one charge signifying a 0 and the opposite charge a 1, every bit of information processed requires the discharge of a small amount of electricity, and its wasteful byproduct, Heat. Magnetism, unlike charge, is a much more efficient way to store digital information, as changing the spin of an electron requires far less work than transferring charge.

Prof. Epsetin says, "Spintronics is often just seen as a way to get more information out of an electron, but really it’s about moving to the next generation of electronics. We could solve many of the problems facing computers today by using spintronics."
 
You can read the full article here


Edited by Griffin Ralston - 11 Aug 2010 at 6:07pm
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.016 seconds.